![]() $ cp ~/Desktop/shim/boot/efi/EFI/BOOT/BOOTX64.EFI. Next, move the BOOTX64.EFI file from the shim package linked in the common issues post to the directory you’re working in, e.g.: extract /EFI/BOOT/BOOTIA32.EFI BOOTIA32.EFI $ osirrox -indev Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-37-1.7.iso -extract_boot_images. “Occasionally, Red Hat might need to collect specific metrics to justify additional time spent on contributing to Fedora or additional investment in Fedora.For anybody looking for a bit more detail on the “power user” workaround from the common issues post:ĭon’t do the below, just do what says in the post below.įirst, extract the boot images from the ISO you wish to modify: ![]() “It is very common for developers to wish to know something about how Fedora software is used, and we will finally have a way to answer such questions," the Fedora team said in the post. Based on the reaction so far, the proposal will probably require some modification. It still requires review and approval by the community-elected Fedora Engineering Steering Committee (FESCo) before implementation. The change proposal is currently just that: a proposal. “Let’s not do that.” What are the next steps? “This change proposal will likely be compared to the Ubuntu spyware complaints from a decade ago, when Ubuntu desktop users’ search queries were sent to Amazon by default,” the Fedora team added. Microsoft, for example, has faced allegations of breaches of privacy over what its operating systems and applications send back to the company’s servers. However, privacy campaigners and regulators have tended to react negatively to the technology. Metrics have long been collected by vendors, ostensibly to improve products. Understand how this tool minimizes the risks related to data loss and other security events The business value of Zscaler Data Protection ![]() Fedora is not the first to seek telemetry Local collection would still occur, but not be uploaded. That said, metrics uploading would be opt-in for upgrading users as there is no mechanism to ask existing users for permission after an upgrade in the same way as for new installations. We are not interested in opt-in metrics.” “Few users would opt in, and these users would not be representative of Fedora users as a whole. “This is to ensure the system is opt-out, not opt-in,” said the Fedora team. Collection of metrics would still occur, but no uploading would happen until the user finishes the privacy page with the toggle still enabled. This is significant because the toggle in gnome-initial-setup will default to being enabled, even though the underlying setting would still be off. The underlying system would be off by default until the user completes the privacy page. The plan would be to deploy the Endless OS metrics system in Fedora, but not the eos-phone-home component. “Making it opt-in means that no one will enable it, so it’s best to have it enabled by default, and improve the experience as much as possible”. “We need to gather insights over some data,” said one user. ![]() Not all users have been in agreement, with some recognizing the need for collection. More were blunter still, with another user stating “the only privacy-preserving way is no telemetry”. However, the word ‘telemetry’ has sparked anger among many in the Fedora community, with one commenter to the proposal post claiming “there must be an internal contest at Red Hat to see which group can generate the most negative press and/or piss off the most people”. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |